Why Some Races Feel Slower – The Real Reasons Behind Speed Limits in Motorsports

Ever watched a MotoGP sprint and thought, “That was quick!” then switched to a NASCAR event that seemed to crawl? You’re not crazy – the pace of a race is built on purpose, not accident. From how long the track is to the rules that keep riders and drivers safe, a lot of decisions push the speed down, and they all have good reasons.

Race length and endurance are the first speed brakes

Take MotoGP as a clear example. Those races usually run about 45 minutes, give or take a few laps. The reason? A blend of excitement and rider stamina. The bikes throw out a ton of power, but they also strain a rider’s body fast. If a race ran for two hours, riders would be exhausted, mistakes would skyrocket, and the show would lose its edge. Shorter races keep the action tight and the riders in control.

The same logic applies to endurance classics like the 24 Hours of Le Mans. While the event itself lasts a full day, each stint is limited to a few hours so drivers can stay sharp. The overall speed of the event looks slower because you’re watching a marathon, not a sprint.

Safety rules force slower corners and lower top speeds

Every motorsport series has a safety checklist that directly caps how fast you can go. For example, the FIA mandates that certain corners on a circuit must have a maximum speed limit. Those limits keep cars stable, reduce the chance of a spin, and protect both drivers and spectators.

In NASCAR, the introduction of stage racing added extra cautions and green‑flag breaks. Those pauses might make the race feel slower, but they give fans more action points and give drivers a chance to reset, which ultimately makes the whole event more engaging.

Even car manufacturers like Subaru stick to rallying instead of jumping into IndyCar or Daytona because their all‑wheel‑drive boxer engines aren’t suited for the high‑speed, low‑drag demands of those series. That mismatch would force them to run slower than the competition, which defeats the point of entering.

Technical limits and vehicle design shape the pace

Bike endurance is another hidden speed factor. A MotoGP bike can’t run at full throttle for the whole race without overheating or wearing out tires. Engineers set a power ceiling and design the bike to deliver a burst of speed, then taper off. The same goes for Formula 1 cars – their hybrid power units are limited to a certain amount of energy per lap, which means drivers have to manage how hard they push.

When you hear fans complain that a race feels “slower,” they’re often reacting to a balance between raw speed and strategy. That balance makes the sport interesting – you’re not just watching who’s fastest, you’re watching who can manage speed, fuel, tires, and even the weather.

So the next time a race feels slower than you expected, remember it’s a mix of safety, endurance, and technical rules all designed to keep the competition fair and the excitement high. The slower moments are just as important as the outright roar of the engine; they give drivers a chance to think, plan, and come back stronger for the final sprint.

Why are Indycar pitstops slower than F1 pitstops?

Why are Indycar pitstops slower than F1 pitstops?

In my latest blog, I delved into why Indycar pitstops are slower than their F1 counterparts. The primary reason is the difference in manpower; Indycar only allows six crew members, while F1 permits about twenty. Consequently, more tasks in Indycar stops are performed sequentially instead of simultaneously, leading to lengthier stops. Furthermore, Indycars have refueling during pitstops, which F1 phased out in 2010, adding to the duration. Lastly, the design of the Indycar, with its larger tires, also adds a few valuable seconds to pitstop times.
Read More